The Mind of
Christ: Abraham Kuyper, John Calvin, and Biblical Theology
But he who is spiritual
judges all things, yet he himself is rightly
judged by no one. For “who has known the mind
of the LORD that he may instruct Him?“ But we have
the mind of Christ (II Corinthians 2:15-16).
“For who has known the
mind of the LORD?
Or who has become His counselor?”
(Romans 11:34)
Abraham Kuyper has
described The Mind of Christ more fully than any
theologian that I have read. Thus, I am going to
let him speak for himself, quoting at length from his
book, Principles of Sacred Theology.
By way of brief
introduction, Kuyper discusses an encyclopedia of
knowledge that is “mined” from the gold of Scripture in
all ages according to the challenges that are presented
to it. In the early centuries, Christians
encountered Ariansim, Arminianism, Gnosticism, and many
other errors and heresies. Later, Biblical truth
experienced syncretism with pagan culture, as the Gospel
spread around the world. Biblical truth even had
to overcome its own dominant church (Roman Catholicism)
which had distorted the Gospel for individuals and
churches. In modern times, we face all the “-isms”
that include secular (humanism, socialism, communism,
etc.) and the religious (Mohammedism, Hinduism, Judaism,
etc.).
The Word of God is more
than sufficient for these challenges.
Indeed, these allow the Bible to be developed more fully
than in the past. Initially, Christians and the
church may be overwhelmed by these challenges, even
experiencing martyrdom. But, little by little, the
Word and the Spirit have overcome on the individual,
social, cultural, and national levels. This
progress has always been impure and stuttering, but
nevertheless advancing in the knowledge of the truth.
The reader must keep is
mind that Kuyper has dogmatically stated a “two-fold
starting point”: the Bible as the very Word of God
written and palingenesis (being born-again or
regeneration). While every thought even in the
believer is tainted by sin, Kuyper is excluding
unbelievers entirely from contributing to this organic
growth of the mind of Christ in believers. Neither
would he include the imposter theologians who deny the
infallibility and inerrancy of the Scriptures and that
the 66 books of the Protestant Bible are all
fully and completely God’s Word written.
Kuyper describes the
process for us.
“The revelation of God is
not an act of a single moment, but a continuous
process, which extends itself across the ages…
according to the nature of its successive content… this
revelation must not be interpreted as an atomistical
self-communication of God to the several individuals,
but must be taken as a revelation to man in his
generations, that is, to the organic unity of
(regenerated) humanity, and only in this organic unity
to the single man.” (257-258)
Only in the combination
of the whole race of man does this revelation reach its
creaturely completeness . . . The knowledge of God is a
common possession, all the riches of which can only be
enjoyed in the communion of our race . . . but because
humanity is adapted to reveal God, and from that
revelation to attain unto His knowledge, does not
individual complement another, and only by the organic
unity and by the individual in communion with that
unity, can the knowledge of God be obtained in a clear
and completer sense. (272)
“(Not) every believer is
able to think out in a clear way, the entire content of
revelation. This is only done by all believers
together.” (289)
One who, himself of a
sound mind, should have to live on some isolated island
among insane people, would run a great risk of becoming
himself insane; and in such a condition, a very
strong mind could only maintain the reality of its
consciousness. Just because we do not exist
atomically, also in our consciousness, in order to
remain firm our own sense cannot afford to lose the
support of a similar sense of others.” (389)
It is the Holy Spirit
who, by illumination, enables the human consciousness to
ever richer insights into (Scripture’s) content…. A
believer of the 19th century knows much more
than a believer of the tenth or third century could
know, but that additional knowledge is ever dug from the
selfsame gold mine… This, of course, does not imply that
the former generations fell short in knowledge of God,
but simply, that the development of the human
consciousness in those times did not make such demands
on the knowledge of God. A child can be as rich in
his God as the full grown man, but because the
consciousness of the adult is more richly unfolded, the
holds the knowledge of God likewise in a more richly
folded form… But however far this increase of knowledge
may proceed in the future, it will never be able to draw
its material from any other source than from the Holy
Scripture…. the substance of the knowledge of God
which comes to us … is identical with the Holy
Scriptures (402).
“It lies entirely in the
organic character of revelation, that it passes through
two periods, the first of which brings it to its
complete measure (the closing of the canon - Ed) and the
second of which allows its, having reached its full
measure, to perform its work. And this is what we
face in the difference between inspiration and
illumination. (419)
John Calvin
John Calvin did not
develop the idea of a community of mind of all
Christians of all ages, as Kuyper did. However, he
did occasionally note that reality.
For even Paul himself, in
another place, after testifying that all the mysteries
of God far exceed the capacity of our understanding,
does nevertheless immediately add, that believers are in
possession of the Lord's mind, because they have
received not the spirit of this world, but that which
has been given them by God, whereby they are instructed
as to his otherwise incomprehensible goodness. See
the footnote to Calvin’s Commentary on
the two verses above.
Biblical Theology
Biblical Theology has
some dimension of this mind of Christ. While this
theology has a diverse nature and application, I mention
it here with this definition.
Biblical theology is
principally concerned with the overall theological
message of the whole Bible. It seeks to understand the
parts in relation to the whole and, to achieve this, it
must work with the mutual interaction of the literary,
historical, and theological dimensions of the various
corpora, and with the inter-relationships of these
within the whole canon of Scripture.
Biblical Theology
In this more narrow
focus, biblical theology strives to more fully develop
and understand the Bible and corresponds to our thoughts
here.
However, in no way would
I condone any theologians of this method who do not
fully subscribe to inerrancy and infallibility.
Biblical theology has within it a number of neo-orthodox
and others who would hedge on some of the Bible’s clear
messages or on the truthfulness of some books and
passages.
(All that you ever wanted
to know about Biblical Theology can be found
here.)
Summary Principles
1. The mind of
Christ only exists in regenerated (born-from-above)
minds who are totally committed to the inerrancy and
infallibility of Scripture. While the Holy Spirit
is a teacher in this process, He never gives anything
that might be considered new revelation in addition to
the current 66 books of the Protestant Bible.
2. The mind of
Christ is often advanced by the tremendous intellect of
one mind, but in its truest sense is always corporate
through the mind of two or more believers, the local
Session, the local congregation, assemblies of churches,
and the universal (“catholic”) church of all ages.
3. The mind of
Christ builds on the work of others. Individuals
who work “atomistically, ignoring the great work of
others both present and past, are renegades to the
corporate nature of Christianity and a danger to the
understanding of revealed truth.
4. The mind of
Christ is sufficient for all Christians in their time of
history.
5. Biblical
theology is a method to increasing the knowledge of the
mind of Christ, but is not identical with it.
6. The mind of
Christ is identical to a fully developed, Biblical
worldview.