An
Encounter Concerning the Practical Application of Love and
Law with a Learned Professor
I recently visited a
friend at one of the Reformed Theological Seminary campuses. He
invited me to sit in on his Bible class, held in the evening. It
“happened” that the professor was discussing the latter chapters
of Exodus, including Exodus 21-23, which are detailed
applications of the Mosaic Law. Briefly, he mentioned the
theonomists, Christians who believe in a more particular and
detailed application of the Old Testament Law, than most
“evangelicals.” (For some reasonable reviews of theonomy,
see these
links.
He was mostly
fair-minded with their position, but he condemned the position
of some theonomists who call for the death penalty of
homosexuals. He did not, then, go on to state his own beliefs
about the ethics or laws that should apply to homosexuals.
So, during break, I
talked with him. I said, “If you don’t think homosexuals should
be put to death, what should be our ethics or laws to govern
their behavior?” “Oh,” he said, “I think that we should try to
evangelize them. I would not shun them. In fact, I would be
willing to have them in my home.” He spoke in the winsome way of
a loving evangelical.
But, he made a major
mistake.
“OK,” I said. “What
will you do, if while he is in you home, if he tries to molest
your son? What will you do, if he is in the park and approaches
your son? What are your recourses, then?” I could see a light go
on in this “learned” professor’s head, as though, “I had never
thought of that.”
Whatever you think of
them, the theonomists are about the business of practically
applying Biblical truth. It is not sufficient to just
criticize them, you must offer an alternative. This
professor, as many Christians, have not thought through the
issue of homosexuality. Yes, we want to evangelize them, if
possible. Yes, we want to befriend them and show them love. But,
no, we do not want them either to approach our children, and we
want to minimize their opportunities to approach our children.
So, the “broadly
evangelical” may draw a line differently from the theonomist.
But, you either stick your head in the sand and ignore the
issue, or you draw a line somewhere that the homosexual does not
cross on penalty of law. God requires government to restrain
evil (Romans 13:3). But,
we cannot have this
patronizing nonsense of limiting our actions only to loving them
into the Kingdom!
|